Looking to hire a post-doc for project of labor formalization

 We are starting a new project that will explore how to promote formalization in the mining sector, with particular attention to the case study of Peruvian gold.  It should be an exciting opportunity to link academic research and policy impact.  We have raised funds to hire a post-doc with experience in qualitative research, willingness to spend time in Peru and interest in policy discussions.  Please either apply or invite others to apply!  You can find more details here. 

More on my new book

Bloomsbury has kindly giving me access to the first few pages of my new book to share with everyone.  You can access them here; I hope you can read it and send me comments.  

The book is in both hardcover for libraries and paperback for those of you who may find it interesting.  I would really appreciate if you can distribute these details around!

Here you have some of the endorsements:

"A compelling case for the urgency of tackling inequality, in Latin America and the world, without falling into the temptation of a silver-bullet approach. Thanks to Diego's insightful book, we now have a better understanding of the policies, politics and history of Latin American inequality. This book will be useful to succeed in the battle against social injustice in the region." --Rebeca Grynspan, Ibero-American Secretary General

"This book, by one of the best experts on inequalities and social policies in Latin America... is a must read in an era of rising global inequality, which is only becoming worse with the COVID-19 pandemic" -- José Antonio Ocampo (Columbia University, former Under-Secretary General of the UN)

"This is an excellent work on the complexities of inequality in Latin America and the lessons we can learn from ideas, social movements, and policies developed in middle income countries to reduce income and wealth inequality. This very important book is a must-read both for scholars of development studies and Latin American politics as well as for practitioners seeking to reduce inequality in developing and developed economies." --Dr Néstor Castañeda, University College London

My upcoming book

My new book is coming out in December.  I wrote it primarily during my year at the Kellogg Institute in Notre Dame and I am very thankful to them for the opportunity.  The book uses the Latin American experience to warn against the economic, political and social costs of inequality in other parts of the world.  It also discusses some of the ways in which Latin Americans have tried to fight inequality and some of the policies and institutions we need to develop in the future.  Although I will discuss more about the book in future entries, I just wanted to share my excitement about the news... at a time when I am finding hard to get excited about many other things.

You can find the link to the book in Bloomsbury here. 

A progressive future... or an opportunity for the radical right?

Let me here start a discussion that I hope to develop further in the future.  In recent weeks, many progressive academics and even journalists, politicians and/or policymakers have begun framing the current pandemic as a window of opportunity for a more humane and progressive development model. 

Here just a couple of examples.  First an article from the New Yorker about Bernie Sanders:

"To be sure, the Democratic Party’s embrace of equalizing economics remains a partial one, but the cataclysmic impact of the coronavirus could conceivably generate more political pressure to rebalance the economy. As the C.E.O.s, bankers, hedge-fund managers, and private-equity partners have retreated to their second homes, the shelf stockers, grocery clerks, subway conductors, bus drivers, delivery workers, nurses, doctors, E.M.S. workers, hospital orderlies, and public-health officials have emerged as indispensable gallants. Without their contribution, it turns out, there would be no functioning society to generate the rewards enjoyed by the overclass."

And here a really interesting article from Science Magazine:

"Other major global crises, such as climate change and biodiversity loss, demand cooperative global responses that don't leave out the poor. Once COVID-19 is under control, the world cannot return to business as usual. A thorough review of worldviews, lifestyles, and the problems of short-term economic valuation must be carried out. A more responsible, more sharing, more caring, more inclusive, and fairer society is required if we are to survive in the Anthropocene."

I fully agree that the crisis has revealed many weaknesses of the way we organize society: the costs of poverty and inequality, the lack of effective international collaboration, the need to strengthen local communities, the lack of proper attention to key workers.  The pandemic also proves many social-democratic ideas right: the importance of public services, the need to have a proper safety net, the central role of the state.  

Yet we run the risk of assuming that these are obvious facts and that most people will feel like we do. But will this really be the case?  Will people who have been in lockdown alone or with their families feel part of a larger community?  Will they have appetite for a revolution?  How will they respond to the lack of jobs, to huge uncertainty about the future? 

Maybe what most people end up supporting is a return to some kind of normality; just life as it was.  Maybe many others keep hoping for easy solutions and clear scapegoats, ending up supporting the radical right.  Let´s not forget that this is what happened in many countries after the Great Depression in 1929.

Of course, politics will matter--as my friend Ben Phillips argues here in an otherwise much more optimistic perspective than mine.  Different countries will go in different directions.  There will be agency from social movements and political parties to influence the agenda.  But I think we need to pay much more attention than we are doing to two issues:

1. How can we convince people that this is the time for progressive idea?  How can we do it in a way that is constructive and does not polarize?  Surely we cannot have faith in most politicians doing the job for us!

2. How can we understand and prepare for the real risk that a very dark kind of politics emerge out of all of this?  

Religious leaders against inequality

The Archbishop of Canterbury on Eastern Sunday:

“The next wave coming is the economic one … We have a choice there as a nation and as a society and as a world. Do we take hold of our destiny and make sure the differences are mitigated, abolished where possible – or do we just let things happen, do we let the market rule, in which case there will be enormous suffering.”

Will religious leaders make a difference?  Will the fight against inequality become more accepted thanks in religious circles?  Surely people like Justin Welby and Pope Francis are trying... and let's only hope their followers are listening.

The manifestations of inequality in the US will never stop surprising me...

From Inequality.org:

The US: best illustration of the class difference during the crisis?

Two articles, one in English and one in Spanish, remind us that the impact of the Corona Virus is already very different across classes.  One is about the way the pandemia has affected different neighborhoods in New York differently and how different people have different opportunities to respond.  I found the other one (about differences in college students) particularly illustrative of a huge problem of the crisis: the unequal impact of doing online teaching. 

Ana Sojo escribe una columna excelente sobre la importancia de la igualdad de ingreso y de acceso a la salud. En los ratos pesimistas, sin embargo, siento que vamos a salir de esta (como paso en 2008) con menos instrumentos y oportunidades para luchar contra la desigualdad. ¡Decidme que me equivoco!

Returning in the times of the coronavirus

I cannot believe that I have been away from my blog since September of last year after a trip to Chile.  How much things have changed!   We could then travel and thought that the main risk for those who live in the UK was Brexit.  Yet the last few months have reminded us how unpredictable life is and how we should not take anything for granted.  An unexpected pandemic is leaving deaths, health care chaos, and a major economic crisis.  Of course, it has also reminded us of the heroism of many (particularly doctors, nurses and many other key workers) and should remind us the importance of public health services.

Yet I am not coming back to the blog to talk about the virus; as much as I would like to contribute to those debates, I do not have particular expertise on the subject.  Instead, I hope to write more often now to: (a) remind us all of the costs of growing costs of inequality; (b) explore the likely impact of the current crisis in income concentration; and, to a lesser extent, (c) discuss the extent to which the global North - global South division is still useful and valid.

To begin, let me include here a few links demonstrating that the impact of the crisis on income distribution is likely to be rather harmful (these articles are from The Economist and the FT, but I will try to diversify more in the future):

How covid-19 exacerbates inequality --the case of the UK

The pandemic shock will make big, powerful firms even mightier

Big hedge funds raise money to capitalize on market turmoil

More tomorrow.  If somebody is reading this and have suggestions or reflections, please let me know.  I realise saving lives and keeping healthy is our priority... but reflecting on the consequences that the crisis can have in one of the key problems of the 21st century is not irrelevant.